John Jenkins writes:
In many respects, the case presented a worst case scenario – it involved a minority squeeze-out of a private company at a price of approximately \$0.43 per share with no market check or competitive sales process. Both parties pointed to valuation analyses prepared by their competing experts, which resulted in wildly divergent valuations. The petitioner’s expert opined that each Synapse share was worth \$4.1876 at the time of transaction, while Synapse’s expert provided a valuation range of \$0.06 to \$0.11 per share. Vice Chancellor Slights acknowledged that this left him in a bind:
… As a result, with the exception of relatively minor adjustments to Synapse’s expert’s conclusions about the amount of its debt and available cash, the Vice Chancellor adopted that expert’s approach to the DCF analysis and concluded that the fair market value of the company’s shares was approximately \$0.23 per share – nearly 50% below the purchase price.