Boston University Law Review

• Lyman Johnson, Delaware’s Non-Waivable Duties, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 701 (2011).

• David H. Webber, Is “Pay-to-Play” Driving Public Pension Fund Activism In Securities Class Actions? An Empirical Study, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 2031 (2010).

California Law Review

該当なし

Columbia Law Review

該当なし

Harvard Law Review

該当なし

Northwestern University Law Review

• Christina L. Boyd & David A. Hoffman, Disputing Limited Liability, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. 853 (2010)

• Doug Winnard, Know When to Hold ‘em, Know When to Fold ‘em: The Collapse of the Auction Rate Securities Market and the Problem of Standing for Securities Holders Under Rule 10b-5, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. 671 (2010)

New York University Law Review

• Darrell A.H. Miller, Guns, Inc.: Citizens United, Mcdonald, and the Future of Corporate Constitutional Rights, 86 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 887 (2011).

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

• William W. Bratton & Michael L. Wachter, The Political Economy of Fraud on the Market, 160 U. Penn. Law. Rev. 69 (2011).

Stanford Law Review

• Ronald J. Gilson, Henry Hansmann & Mariana Pargendler, Regulatory Dualism as a Development Strategy: Corporate Reform in Brazil, the United States, and the European Union, 63 Stan. L. Rev. 475 (2011).

• Mark J. Roe, The Derivatives Market’s Payment Priorities as Financial Crisis Accelerator, 63 Stan. L. Rev. 539 (2011).

Texas Law Review

• Marcel Kahan & Edward B. Rock, When the Government Is the Controlling Shareholder, 89 Texas L. Rev. 1293 (2011)

• Jesse M. Fried, Share Repurchases, Equity Issuances, and the Optimal Design of Executive Pay, 89 Texas L. Rev. 1113 (2011).

University of Chicago Law Review

• Richard Squire, Strategic Liability in the Corporate Group, 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 605 (2011).

U.C.L.A. Law Review

• Lee Harris, Shareholder Campaign Funds: A Campaign Subsidy Scheme for Corporate Elections, 58 UCLA L. Rev. 167 (2010)

Virginia Law Review

• Marcel Kahan and Edward Rock, The Insignificance of Proxy Access, 97 Va. L. Rev. 1347 (2011)

Yale Law Journal

• Daniel S. Alterbaum, Comment: To “Make Full Disclosure and Play No Tricks”: A Proposal To Enhance Fee Transparency After Jones v. Harris Associates, 120 Yale L.J. 1579 (2011).

• Benjamin Klein, Comment: The Right Solution to the Wrong Problem: The Status of Controlling Shareholders After In re John Q. Hammons Hotels Inc., 120 Yale L.J. 1251 (2011).

Journal of Corporation Law

• Stephen M. Bainbridge, Insider Trading Inside the Betlway, 36 J. Corp. Law (2011).

• Robert A. Prentice, Permanently Reviving the Temorary Insider, 36 J. Corp. Law (2011).

• J.W. Verret, Defending Against Shareholder Proxy Access: Delaware’s Future Reviewing Company Defenses in the Era of Dodd-Frank, 36 J. Corp. Law (2011)

• Fried, Jesse, Excess-Pay Clawbacks, 36 J. Corp. L. 721 (2011).

• Gideon Mark, Confidential Witnesses in Securities Litigation, 36 J. Corp. L. 551 (2011).

Business Lawyer

• Leo E. Strine, Jr., One Fundamental Corporate Governance Question We Face: Can Corporations Be Managed For The Long Term Unless Their Powerful Electorates Also Act And Think Long Term? 66 Bus. Law. 1 (2010)