あけましておめでとうございます。本年もどうぞ宜しくお願い致します。

続きを読む →

Yale Law Journal

• Anthony J. Casey, The New Corporate Web: Tailored Entity Partitions and Creditors’ Selective Enforcement, 124 Yale L.J. 2680 (2015),

• Ian Ayres & Quinn Curtis, Beyond Diversification: The Pervasive Problem of Excessive Fees and “Dominated Funds” in 401(k) Plans, 124 Yale L.J. 1476 (2015)

• Jesse M. Fried, The Uneasy Case for Favoring Long-Term Shareholders, 124 Yale L.J. 1554 (2015)

• John C. Coates, IV, Cost-Benefit Analysis of Financial Regulation: Case Studies and Implications, 124 Yale L.J. 882 (2015),

Harvard Law Reveiw

該当なし

University of Chicago Law Review

• Eric A. Posner, How Do Bank Regulators Determine Capital-Adequacy Requirements?, 82 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1853 (2015),

Columbia Law Review

• Lucian A. Bebchuk, Alon Brav & Wei Jiang, The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism, 115 Colum. L. Rev. 1085 (2015),

• Jeffrey N. Gordon & Wolf-Georg Ringe, Bank Resolution in the European Banking Union: A Transatlantic Perspective on What It Would Take, 115 Colum. L. Rev. 1297 (2015),

• Gideon Parchomovsky & Alex Stein, Catalogs, 115 Colum. L. Rev. 165 (2015)

Stanford Law Review

• Tess Wilkinson-Ryan & David A. Hoffman, The Common Sense of Contract Formation, 67 Stan. L. Rev. 1269 (2015)

• Alan Schwartz, Regulating for Rationality, 67 Stan. L. Rev. 1373 (2015)

New York University Law Rev.

該当なし

Virginia Law Review

• Eric L. Talley, Corporate Inversions and the Unbundling Of Regulatory Competition, 101 Va. L. Rev. 1649 (2015)

• Scott Baker & Albert Choi, Contract’s Role in Relational Contract, 101 Va. L. Rev. 559 (2015)

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

• Jonathan S. Masur & Eric A. Posner, Toward a Pigouvian State, 164 U. Pa. L. Rev. 93 (2015)

• Edward B. Rock, Corporate Law Doctrine and the Legacy of American Legal Realism, 163 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2019 (2015)

• Tess Wilkinson-Ryan, Intuitive Formalism in Contract, 163 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2109 (2015)

• Ryan Bubb & Prasad Krishnamurthy, Regulating Against Bubbles: How Mortgage Regulation Can Keep Main Street and Wall Street Safe—from Themselves, 163 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1539 (2015)

Duke Law Journal

• Merritt B. Fox, Lawrence R. Glosten & Gabriel V. Rauterberg, The New Stock Market: Sense and Nonsense, 65 Duke L.J. 191 (2015),

California Law Review

該当なし

Business Lawyer

• Leo E. Strine, Jr., Documenting the Deal: How Quality Control and Candor Can Improve Boardroom Decision-making and Reduce the Litigation Target Zone, 70 Bus. Law. 679 (2015)

• Peter J. Henning, What’s So Bad About Insider Trading Law?, 70 Bus. Law. 751 (2015)

• Robert C. Clark, Harmony or Dissonance? The Good Governance Ideas of Academics and Worldly Players, 70 Bus. Law. 321 (2015)

• Henry T. C. Hu, Financial Innovation and Governance Mechanisms: The Evolution of Decoupling and Transparency, 70 Bus. Law. 347 (2015)

• E. Norman Veasey & Grover C. Brown, An Overview of the General Counsel’s Decision Making on Dispute-Resolution Strategies in Complex Business Transactions, 70 Bus. Law. 407 (2015)

• Merritt B. Fox, Halliburton II: It All Depends on What Defendants Need to Show to Establish No Impact on Price, 70 Bus. Law. 437 (2015)

University of Iowa Law Review

該当なし

Boston University Law Review

該当なし

Northwestern University Law Review

Texas Law Review

• Jill E. Fisch, Sean J. Griffith & Steven Davidoff Solomon, Confronting the Peppercorn Settlement in Merger Litigation: An Empirical Analysis and a Proposal for Reform, 93 Texas L. Rev. 557 (2015)

UCLA Law Review

• Lynn M. LoPucki & Joseph W. Doherty, Bankruptcy Survival, 62 UCLA L. Rev. 970 (2015)

Journal of Corporation Law

• Matthew D. Cain, Antonio J. Macias & Steven Davidoff Solomon, Broken Promises: The Role of Reputation in Private Equity Contracting and Strategic Default, 40 J. Corp. L. 565 (2015)

Yale Law Journal

• Yair Listokin, Bounded Institutions, 124 Yale L.J. 336 (2014)

• Henry Hansmann & Mariana Pargendler, The Evolution of Shareholder Voting Rights: Separation of Ownership and Consumption, 123 Yale L.J. 948 (2014)

Harvard Law Review

• Ryan Bubb & Richard H. Pildes, How Behavioral Economics Trims Its Sails and Why?, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 1593 (2014)

Stanford Law Review

• Stephen M. Bainbridge & M. Todd Henderson, Boards-R-Us: Reconceptualizing Corporate Boards, 66 Stan. L. Rev. 1051 (2014)

Columbia Law Review

• Leo E. Strine, Jr., Can We Do Better by Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction to the Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law, 114 Colum. L. Rev. 449 (2014)

• Cass R. Sunstein, The Real World of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Thirty-Six Questions (and Almost as Many Answers), 114 Colum. L. Rev. 167 (2014)

University of Chicago Law Review

• Eric A. Posner & E. Glen Weyl, Quadratic Voting as Efficient Corporate Governance, 81 U. Chi. L. Rev. 251 (2014)

• Daniel Schwarcz & Steven L. Schwarcz, Regulating Systemic Risk in Insurance, 81 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1569 (2014)

New York University Law Review

該当なし

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

• Brandon L. Garrett, The Constitutional Standing of Corporations, 163 U. Pa. L. Rev. 95 (2014)

• Thomas W. Merrill & Margaret L. Merrill, Dodd-Frank Orderly Liquidation Authority: Too Big for the Constitution?, 163 U. Pa. L. Rev. 165 (2014)

• Jill E. Fisch & Tess Wilkinson-Ryan, Why Do Retail Investors Make Costly Mistakes? An Experiment on Mutual Fund Choice, 162 U. Pa. L. Rev. 605 (2014)

• Jesse M. Fried, Insider Trading via the Corporation, 162 U. Pa. L. Rev. 801 (2014)

• Mark J. Roe, Structural Corporate Degradation Due to Too-Big-To-Fail Finance, 162 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1419 (2014)

Virginia Law Review

• George S. Geis, Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Preclusion Problem, 100 Va. L. Rev. 261 (2014)

• Ronald J. Gilson & Reinier Kraakman, Market Efficiency after the Financial Crisis: It’s Still a Matter of Information Costs, 100 Va. L. Rev. 313 (2014)

• David Zaring, Litigating the Financial Crisis, 100 Va. L. Rev. 1405 (2014)

• Robert J. Jackson, Jr. & Colleen Honigsberg, The Hidden Nature of Executive Retirement Pay, 100 Va. L. Rev. 479 (2014)

California Law Review

該当なし

Duke Law Journal

• Cass R. Sunstein, Choosing Not to Choose, 64 Duke L.J. 1–52 (2014)

Cornell Law Review

• Ronald J. Gilson, Charles F. Sabel & Robert E. Scott, Text and Context: Contract Interpretation as Contract Design, 100 Cornell L. Rev. 23 (2014)

• Jonathan Macey & Joshua Mitts, Finding Order in the Morass: The Three Real Justifications for Piercing the Corporate Veil, 100 Cornell L. Rev. 99 (2014)

• John C. Coffee, Jr., Extraterritorial Financial Regulation: Why E.T. Can’t Come Home, 99 Cornell L. Rev. 1259 (2014)

• Richard Squire, Clearinghouses as Liquidity Partitioning, 99 Cornell L. Rev. 857 (2014)

Texas Law Review

• William W. Bratton & Michael L. Wachter, Bankers and Chancellors, 93 Texas L. Rev. 1 (2014)

Business Lawyer

• Lucian A. Bebchuk & Allen Ferrell, Rethinking Basic, 69 Bus. Law. 671 (2014)

• Joseph A. Grundfest, Damages and Reliance Under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, 69 Bus. Law. 307 (2014)

Yale Law Journal

• Cass R. Sunstein, The Storrs Lectures: Behavioral Economics and Paternalism, 122 Yale L.J. 1826 (2013)

• David Freeman Engstrom, Agencies as Litigation Gatekeepers, 123 Yale L.J. 616 (2013)

Harvard Law Review

• 該当なし

Stanford Law Review

• Michael Klausner, Fact and Fiction in Corporate Law and Governance, 65 Stan. L. Rev. 1325 (2013)

Columbia Law Review

• Ronald J. Gilson & Jeffrey N. Gordon, The Agency Costs of Agency Capitalism: Activist Investors and the Revaluation of Governance Rights, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 863 (2013)

• Douglas G. Baird & Anthony J. Casey, No Exit? Withdrawal Rights and the Law of Corporate Reorganizations, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 1 (2013)

• Lucian A. Bebchuk, The Myth That Insulating Boards Serves Long-Term Value, 113 Colum L. Rev. 1637 (2013)

• David Friedman, The Regulator in Robes: Examining the SEC and the Delaware Court of Chancery’s Parallel Disclosure Regimes, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 1543 (2013)

University of Chicago Law Review

• Lauren E. Willis, When Nudges Fail: Slippery Defaults, 80 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1155 (2013)

• David A. Skeel, Jr., States of Bankruptcy, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 677 (2012)

New York University Law Review

• 該当なし

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

• Barry E. Adler & Marcel Kahan, The Technology of Creditor Protection, 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1773 (2013)

• William W. Bratton & Michael L. Wachter, A Theory of Preferred Stock, 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1815 (2013)

• Leo E. Strine, Jr., Poor Pitiful or Potently Powerful Preferred, 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1815 (2013) (In response to William W. Bratton & Michael L. Wachter, A Theory of Preferred Stock)

• Edward B. Rock, Adapting to the New Shareholder-Centric Reality, 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1907 (2013)

• Kenneth S. Abraham, Four Conceptions of Insurance, 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 653 (2013)

• Cass R. Sunstein, Deciding by Default, 162 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1 (2013)

• Samantha Jacoby, Solar-Backed Securities: Opportunities, Risks, and the Specter of the Subprime Mortgage Crisis, 162 U. Pa. L. Rev. 203 (2013)

Virginia Law Review

• Jordan M. Barry, John William Hatfield & Scott Duke Kominers, On Derivatives Markets and Social Welfare: A Theory of Empty Voting and Hidden Ownership, 99 Va. L. Rev. 1103 (2013)

California Law Review

• Mark J. Roe, Clearinghouse Overconfidence, 101 Calif. L. Rev. 1641 (2013)

• Stavros Gadinis, From Independence to Politics in Financial Regulation, 101 Calif. L. Rev. 327 (2013)

Michigan Law Review

• James J. Park, Securities Class Actions and Bankrupt Companies, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 547 (2013)

• Mark J. Roe & Federico Cenzi Venezze, A Capital Market, Corporate Law Approach to Creditor Conduct, 112 Mich. L. Rev. 59 (2013)

• Kenneth Ayotte & Henry Hansmann, Legal Entities as Transferable Bundles of Contracts, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 715 (2013)

Duke Law Journal

• John F. Coyle and Gregg D. Polsky, Acqui-hiring, 63 Duke L.J. 281–346 (2013)

• Adam J. Levitin, The Paper Chase: Securitization, Foreclosure, and the Uncertainty of Mortgage Title, 63 Duke L.J. 637–734 (2013)

Northwestern University Law Review

• Randall S. Thomas & Robert B. Thompson, A Theory of Representative Shareholder Suits and its Application to Multijurisdictional Litigation, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1753 (2012)

Business Lawyer

• 該当なし

Iowa University Journal of Corporation Law

• 該当なし

Boston University Law Review

• 該当なし

Texas Law Review

• Jonathan Macey, Sublime Myths: An Essay in Honor of the Shareholder Value Myth and the Tooth Fairy, 91 Texas L. Rev. 911 (2013), http://www.texaslrev.com/wp-content/uploads/Macey.pdf

U.C.L.A. Law Review

• Robert J. Jackson, Jr., Private Equity and Executive Compensation, 60 UCLA L. Rev. 638 (2013)

• Tom C.W. Lin, The New Investor, 60 UCLA L. Rev. 678 (2013)

• Kathryn Judge, Interbank Discipline, 60 UCLA L. Rev. 1262 (2013)

• Clyde Spillenger, Teaching Twombly and Iqbal: Elements Analysis and the Ghost of Charles Clark, 60 UCLA L. Rev. 1740 (2013)

その他

• Lucian A. Bebchuk & Allen Ferrell, Rethinking Basic (2013)

• Robert H. Sitkoff, An Economic Theory of Fiduciary Law, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Andrew Gold & Paul Miller eds., Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2014)

• Steven L. Schwarcz & Ori Sharon, The Bankruptcy-Law Safe Harbor for Derivatives: A Path-Dependence Analysis (Nov. 25, 2013)

• Richard A. Booth, The Two Faces of Materiality, 38 Del. J. Corp. L. —- (2013)

• Brian J. Broughman & Jesse M. Fried, Carrots and Sticks: How VCs Induce Entrepreneurial Teams to Sell Startups, 98 Cornell L. Review 1319–57 (2013)

• Mark J. Roe, Structural Corporate Degradation Due to Too-Big-To-Fail Finance, — U. Pa. L. Rev. — (forthcoming 2014)

• John Armour & Brian R. Cheffins, The Origins of the Market for Corporate Control, ECGI – Law Working Paper No. 226/2013 (September 11, 2013)

• Joseph Grundfest, Damages and Reliance under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 150 (August 28, 2013)

• Stephen M. Bainbridge, Must Salmon Love Meinhard? Agape and Partnership Fiduciary Duties, UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 13-17 (October 8, 2013)

• Yesha Yadav, Insider Trading in the Derivatives Market (and What it Means for Everyone Else), Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13-24 (August 28, 2013)

• Stephen M. Bainbridge, Preserving Director Primacy by Managing Shareholder Interventions (2013)

• Stephen M. Bainbridge & M. Todd Henderson, Boards-R-Us: Reconceptualizing Corporate Boards, — Stan. L. Rev. — (forthcoming 2014)

• Steven L. Schwarcz, Rollover Risk: Ideating a U.S. Debt Default, 55 B.C. L. Rev. — (forthcoming 2014)

• Zhihong Chen, Yuan Huang & K. C. John Wei, Executive Pay Disparity and the Cost of Equity Capital, — J. Fin. & Quantitative Analysis — (forthcoming),

• Steven M. Davidoff & Christina M. Sautter, Lock-Up Creep, 38 J. Corp. L. (2013),

• Bang Dang Nguyen & Kasper Meisner Nielsen, When Blockholders Leave Feet First: Do Ownership and Control Affect Firm Value? (2013)

• Lucian A. Bebchuk, Alon P. Brav & Wei Jiang, The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism (2013)

• Mark J. Roe, Corporate Short-Termism—In the Boardroom and in the Courtroom, (forthcoming)

• Mohsen Manesh, Defined by Dictum: The Geography of Revlon-Land in Cash and Mixed Consideration Transactions, (2013)

• Mohsen Manesh, Damning Dictum: The Default Duty Debate in Delaware, 39 J. Corp. L. (forthcoming 2013)

• David A. Skeel, Jr., Behavioralism in Finance and Securities Law, (2013)

• Hillary A. Sale, Public Governance, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2013)

• Stephen M. Bainbridge, Managing Shareholder Interventions: An Updated Director Primacy Critique of Shareholder Empowerment Research , Handbook on Shareholder Power and Activism (forthcoming 2013)

Boston University Law Review

• Lyman Johnson, Delaware’s Non-Waivable Duties, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 701 (2011).

• David H. Webber, Is “Pay-to-Play” Driving Public Pension Fund Activism In Securities Class Actions? An Empirical Study, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 2031 (2010).

California Law Review

該当なし

Columbia Law Review

該当なし

Harvard Law Review

該当なし

Northwestern University Law Review

• Christina L. Boyd & David A. Hoffman, Disputing Limited Liability, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. 853 (2010)

• Doug Winnard, Know When to Hold ‘em, Know When to Fold ‘em: The Collapse of the Auction Rate Securities Market and the Problem of Standing for Securities Holders Under Rule 10b-5, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. 671 (2010)

New York University Law Review

• Darrell A.H. Miller, Guns, Inc.: Citizens United, Mcdonald, and the Future of Corporate Constitutional Rights, 86 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 887 (2011).

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

• William W. Bratton & Michael L. Wachter, The Political Economy of Fraud on the Market, 160 U. Penn. Law. Rev. 69 (2011).

Stanford Law Review

• Ronald J. Gilson, Henry Hansmann & Mariana Pargendler, Regulatory Dualism as a Development Strategy: Corporate Reform in Brazil, the United States, and the European Union, 63 Stan. L. Rev. 475 (2011).

• Mark J. Roe, The Derivatives Market’s Payment Priorities as Financial Crisis Accelerator, 63 Stan. L. Rev. 539 (2011).

Texas Law Review

• Marcel Kahan & Edward B. Rock, When the Government Is the Controlling Shareholder, 89 Texas L. Rev. 1293 (2011)

• Jesse M. Fried, Share Repurchases, Equity Issuances, and the Optimal Design of Executive Pay, 89 Texas L. Rev. 1113 (2011).

University of Chicago Law Review

• Richard Squire, Strategic Liability in the Corporate Group, 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 605 (2011).

U.C.L.A. Law Review

• Lee Harris, Shareholder Campaign Funds: A Campaign Subsidy Scheme for Corporate Elections, 58 UCLA L. Rev. 167 (2010)

Virginia Law Review

• Marcel Kahan and Edward Rock, The Insignificance of Proxy Access, 97 Va. L. Rev. 1347 (2011)

Yale Law Journal

• Daniel S. Alterbaum, Comment: To “Make Full Disclosure and Play No Tricks”: A Proposal To Enhance Fee Transparency After Jones v. Harris Associates, 120 Yale L.J. 1579 (2011).

• Benjamin Klein, Comment: The Right Solution to the Wrong Problem: The Status of Controlling Shareholders After In re John Q. Hammons Hotels Inc., 120 Yale L.J. 1251 (2011).

Journal of Corporation Law

• Stephen M. Bainbridge, Insider Trading Inside the Betlway, 36 J. Corp. Law (2011).

• Robert A. Prentice, Permanently Reviving the Temorary Insider, 36 J. Corp. Law (2011).

• J.W. Verret, Defending Against Shareholder Proxy Access: Delaware’s Future Reviewing Company Defenses in the Era of Dodd-Frank, 36 J. Corp. Law (2011)

• Fried, Jesse, Excess-Pay Clawbacks, 36 J. Corp. L. 721 (2011).

• Gideon Mark, Confidential Witnesses in Securities Litigation, 36 J. Corp. L. 551 (2011).

Business Lawyer

• Leo E. Strine, Jr., One Fundamental Corporate Governance Question We Face: Can Corporations Be Managed For The Long Term Unless Their Powerful Electorates Also Act And Think Long Term? 66 Bus. Law. 1 (2010)