For Whom is the Corporation Managed?

  • Moderator
    • Edward Rock, Martin Lipton Professor of Law; Director, Institute for Corporate Governance & Finance, NYU School of Law
  • Panelists:
    • Martin Lipton ’55, Partner, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; Trustee and Adjunct Professor, NYU School of Law
    • Kathryn King Sudol ’98, Partner, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett; Trustee, NYU School of Law
    • Anthony Welters ’77, Executive Chairman, BlackIvy Group; Chairman Emeritus, NYU Law Board of Trustees

California Bill Requires Companies to Include Directors From Underrepresented Communities on their Boards

On August 30, 2020, the California State Legislature passed a new and unprecedented bill intended to promote greater diversity in corporate boardrooms. If signed into law by the governor, California’s Assembly Bill (AB) 979 would require each publicly held corporation whose principal executive offices are located in California to have a minimum number of directors from an “underrepresented community” on its board of directors.

via Wall St. J., Davis Polk

Business Roundtable, Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation (Aug. 2019)

See also WLRK, WLRK

Barbara A. Bliss et al., Negative Activism, 97 Washington University Law Review (forthcoming)

  • Barbara A. Bliss et al., Negative Activism, 97 Washington University Law Review (forthcoming)

Shareholder activism has become one of the most important and widely studied topics in law and finance. To date, popular and academic accounts have focused on what we call “positive activism,” where activists seek to profit from positive changes in the share prices of targeted firms. In this Article, we undertake the first comprehensive study of positive activism’s mirror image, which we term “negative activism.” Whereas positive activists focus on increasing share prices, negative activists take short positions to profit from decreasing share prices.

via Harvard

日本経済新聞「株主総会、実のある対話へ法改正 株主提案に上限案」(2018年1月15日)

もう一つの柱である取締役会改革では、社外取締役の設置の義務付けが焦点だ。主に上場会社を対象に義務付ける案と、現行のまま義務付けない案を併記する。義務付けには企業経営の透明性向上に期待する声がある。一方、東京証券取引所の上場企業の9割超が社外取締役を設けており、あえて義務付ける必要はないとの見方もある。