あけましておめでとうございます。本年もどうぞ宜しくお願い致します。
「financial regulation」タグアーカイブ
大統領選の結果に関するメモランダム
〔題名を変更しました〕
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, The Trump Transition and Possible Directions for Financial Regulatory Reform (Nov. 17, 2016)
President-Elect Trump’s transition website promises to “dismantle the Dodd-Frank Act and replace it with new policies to encourage economic growth and job creation.” To help our clients keep up with the reorientation of the financial regulatory framework, Davis Polk is launching a new blog, FinRegReform.com. Our most recent entry on the blog is our memorandum on Rep. Jeb Hensarling’s (R-TX) Financial CHOICE Act, introduced earlier this year, which we view as a starting point that signals a potential general direction of travel for financial reform. It is not the end, however, as we expect that the Republican Congress and Administration will have more ambitious plans for changes to the regulatory framework, and complex negotiations both within the Republican Party and with Democrats will further shape the ultimate result. The first post on our blog describes, in more technical detail, how a regulatory rollback might work.
-
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, 2016 U.S. Presidential and Congressional Elections: Preliminary Observations and Potential Implications for Financial Services Legislation and Regulation (Nov. 15, 2016)
-
The Economist American bankers look forward to a bonfire of financial rules
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Ten Key Implications of Donald Trump’s Electoral Victory for Financial and Securities Regulation
-
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Predictions on Possible Changes to and Timing of the Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Provisions (Dec. 12, 2016)
-
Hal S. Scott & John Gulliver, Op-ed: How Dodd-Frank will change under Trump and the next Congress (Dec. 12, 2016)
-
Shearman & Sterling LLP, The Changing Fiduciary Duty Landscape in a Trump Presidency
Eugene Fama’s advice for the next president
- Eugene Fama’s advice for the next president
米国証券取引委員会のPiwowar委員による規制における経済分析
Given the importance of economic analysis to its work, I commend the Board for adopting formal guidance on the subject. Like the SEC’s own internal guidance on conducting economic analysis, the PCAOB’s guidance on rulemaking recognizes four main elements: (1) the need for the rule, (2) the baseline for measuring the rule impacts, (3) the alternatives considered, and (4) the economic impacts of the rule and alternatives. With respect to the last point, there are consequences when rules are adopted – some intended, others not. It is the latter set of consequences, the unintended consequences, for which a robust economic analysis can particularly helpful. …
Myth 1: “Economic analysis” and “cost-benefit analysis” are the same thing …
Myth 2: Economic analysis in rulemaking just slows down the rulemaking process …
Myth 3: Economic analysis is a partisan political issue …
Myth 4: Economic analysis is only relevant to rulemaking …
Myth 5: Economic analysis is only a fad … (footnote omitted)
Equity is Cheap for Large Financial Institutions: The International Evidence
- Priyank Gandhi, Hanno N. Lustig & Alberto Plazzi, Equity is Cheap for Large Financial Institutions: The International Evidence
Most Americans Foresee Death of Cash in Their Lifetime
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Predatory Lending (HBO)
- Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Predatory Lending (HBO)
Going Cashless Around the World
Dodd-Frank 956 Reproposal
- Davis Polk & Wardwell, Dodd-Frank Section 956 Incentive Compensation Reproposal
The Top 10 Corporate and Securities Articles of 2015
新たなリストが公開されましたのでリストを更新しました。今年の結果も,妥当なものと思われます。
via Conglomerate, Background, Harvard, NYU, NYU